Thursday, February 20, 2020

Strategic Management Case Study of SABMiller Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Strategic Management of SABMiller - Case Study Example This development is similar to that proposed by Johnson et al (pp. 240, 2006). As bases of competition, SABMILLER had a strategy positioning on four fronts. It considered maintaining a price and differentiation strategy, with particular focus on markets in developing economies. In doing so, its combination of price and differentiation strategy justified its hybrid strategy. Here a hybrid strategy refers to the act of simultaneously achieving product differentiation and low pricing than competitors. The success of such a strategy depended on SABMILLER's ability to deliver enhanced benefits to customers together with low prices while achieving sufficient margins for reinvestment to maintain and develop the bases of differentiation. Secondly, to achieve competitive advantage as a strategy positioning SABMILLER opted to sustain operations in the markets it already controlled, while maintaining hypercompetition such that the frequency, boldness and aggressiveness of dynamic moves accelerated to create a condition of constant disequilibrium. At the same time, the company embarked on redefining collaboration which took the dimension of taking over other companies in the same line of business. Apart from this, one of the most vital issues to shape its positioning strategy was its involvement in game theory wherein every competitor contrived to get the best possible strategic solution for themselves given the response from each other. Thirdly, under detailed choices SABMILLER determined its positioning strategy by defining its mode of growth. From information read in the case, the company's decision to be listed on the London Stock Exchange was strategically backed by the motif to raise more capital for expansion. In the light of this, the company made a number of moves to merge or take over other companies. b) The strategic priorities for SABMILLER at the time of the case were basically centred on growth. This growth was to phased and comprised organic growth and physical growth. Organic growth refers to growth that would come as a result of reinvesting its excess profits back in the business to increase production capacity or expand into new markets. Such a move had significant stimulus from the statistics that the world's five major breweries could more or less account for just 30% of global demand. This therefore steered the move to expand production capacity and enter unexploited markets in developing economies. Meanwhile, physical growth refers to growth that ought to come as a result of harnessing more capital to expand. So, moves like listing itself on the London Stock Exchange to raise more capital come to justify the fulfillment of SABMILLER's strategic priorities. This was the only logical step if the decision to expand into foreign markets had to be a realised strategy. 2) The company's core competencies were seen to be the activities and processes through which resources (in/tangible and non/physical assets) are deployed in such a way as to achieve competitive advantage in ways as to achieve competitive advantage much to the illusion of competitors. A summary tool to identify these capabilities and resources is as shown below: Threshold capabilities are those essential for an organisation to be able to compete in a given market (Johnson et al, 2006). The strength of these capabilities

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Death penalty should be abolished Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Death penalty should be abolished - Essay Example A punishment, which was put into effect in 1500 in England, was opposed by many academics in 1750. These academics included Cesare Beccaria who was the Italian jurist; Voltaire who was the French philosopher; and, Jeremy Bentham and Samuel Romilly, who were the English law reformers. They presented the argument that death penalty was the cruel form of punishing the criminals, and it is most often applied on innocent people. However, there are many counter-arguments that support the death penalty. This paper intends to juxtapose the arguments and counter-arguments regarding death penalty; and, support the statement that capital punishment or death penalty is cruel, and should be abolished. Ethics do not allow a government to take lives of its nationals. There is good number of chances that innocent lives will be put to death under this punishment, and there can be no compensation for this. It is possible that capital punishment converts to manslaughter by killing someone convicted of murder, when the murderer says that it was not murder but an inadvertent killing, such as killing in self-defense. An example is the open and shut case of James McNicol, who was put to death in December 1945. Although James did not oppose the conviction of murder; yet, after his death, Elaine Merrilees, his niece discovered that he was only guilty of manslaughter and not murder. Hence, death penalty can be understood as a violation of human or civil rights. Wrongful conviction also includes cases where people make false confessions. Such people are innocent in actual, and are penalized to death. Whether the court announces death penalty for a convict or not depends less on the criminal act and the evidences, and more on the skill of the lawyers, the financial status of the criminal, the socio-economic status, and the race and color. These factors result into biased decisions from the court, resulting in either making the real criminal escape the punishment or enforcing death penalty on to some other innocent person. This makes the whole system of death penalty illogical and heinous. However, it cannot be stated as a final decision that murderers should be given relaxation in punishment, which makes the debate of adopting or banning the capital punishment all the more daunting. Death penalty has deepened its roots strongly in many countries, and the victims are often Hispanics and the minorities, who are killed due to racial discrimination. It would have been somewhat acceptable if the punishment was for everyone, regardless of what race, color, or ethnic group the murderer belonged to, but since most of the times racial biases come across, the situation gets worse. This also becomes the cause for hatred between different ethnic groups, and may give rise to riots and a long sequence of killings based on racial differences. Marquart, Ekland-Olson and Sorensen (86) affirm that: Rather than systematically sentencing younger minorities to death, murderers of all ra cial categories who received death tended to be younger than the larger pool of imprisoned convicted murderers- although the difference in age between Hispanics sentenced to death or those imprisoned was not statistically significant. The family of the one who is being put to capital punishment suffers very badly. Negative impacts are inflicted on their innocent minds because they have to come to terms not only with the sentence of their loved one but also with his death, and that too so cruelly. Therefore, the agony of